AdSense

Showing posts with label acquisition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label acquisition. Show all posts

Monday, March 3, 2014

iPhone 6 front panel image leaked

Internet rumour mill is once again buzzing with leaks about Apple's next-generation iPhone.

A Chinese forum has leaked a couple of images of what it claims is the front panel of the upcoming iPhone 6. The images show that the upcoming model will have an edge-to-edge screen that is bigger in size than that of iPhone 5S, 5C and 5, with no bezels at all on the sides. The alleged images of the next-generation iPhone also show the Home button positioned closer to the display.
It has been reported several times in the past that Apple will unveil two iPhones this year, one with a 4.7-inch screen and other with 5.5- or 5.7-inch display. The front panel pictured in the leaked image seems to be of the 4.7-inch iPhone.

In February this year, the first set of leaked iPhone images surfaced on the internet. These images showed that the next-generation iPhone will sport a design similar to that of iPad Air and be much thinner than the iPhone 5S.

This will be the first time that the company will venture into the phablet territory, which is dominated by arch rival Samsung. Other rumoured features of the next-generation iPhone include health-centred apps, 13MP camera, solar charging, scratch-resistant sapphire screen and faster Wi-Fi.

Apple is also expected to broaden the functions to the Touch ID fingerprint sensor with the next iPhone.

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Holographic Technology: Make the world your Office

It could be as simple as negotiating an elaborate deal with a businessman — even when you are sitting in an office on the other side of the world. Or it could be as complex as a hospital’s chief cardiologist making final checks before surgery — for a patient lying in an isolated village 500 miles away. Or it could be as personal as making sure you see your children when they get home from school — even though you are in a different time zone.

In the next few years, a technological leap in video communication is about to change the way we interact, work and live our lives.

Software such as Skype – which boasted 299 million users in June 2013 — and Apple’s FaceTime have already transformed personal relationships, meaning that families and friends can stay in touch from anywhere in the world.

But now teleconferencing — and its modern appellation, telepresence — is beginning to change our professional lives, too.

The last few years have already seen a sharp rise in “remote working” — employees working from home. According to a 2012 Ipsos/Reuters poll, around one in five people in the world frequently “telecommute” to work, and nearly 10% work remotely from home every day.
Meanwhile, companies expanding around the globe face pressure from shareholders and regulators to minimise staff travel between offices for meetings, enabling more energy-efficient choices and reducing expenses. 

A proliferation of better-quality, cost-effective technology addresses this need. The TP3200 video conferencing system for example, was recently launched by communications technology provider Huawei Enterprise. It is designed especially for group meetings and uses a specialised image-processing device — a so-called co-optical centre camera — to provide the world’s first panoramic telepresence system.

“HD (high-definition)-resolution cameras and reliable broadband connectivity have vastly improved the teleconferencing experience,” says Jack He Liang, video conferencing director at the firm. 

“More people, and more employers, are beginning to see the benefits of video communication.

“Not only can it reduce costs, improve efficiency and save on human resources, but video conferencing also makes it easier to convey your idea. When you can communicate with your eyes and face, both sides [of the meeting] feel more confident.”

Teleconferencing no longer requires participants to submit to a fixed system of technical standards. Instead, many systems now utilise what is called BYOD.
“It’s short for ‘Bring Your Own Device,’” says He Liang. “The system recognises that many workers already own tablets, smartphones and laptops with cameras — and integrates them.”
The result is a step change in how we see, and carry out, our jobs.

So it is little surprise that global businesses are expected to spend $3.75bn (£2.3bn) on videoconferencing technology by 2016. Smart 2020, a study commissioned by the Global e-Sustainability Initiative, (a programme launched in 2001 to promote sustainable development in the ICT sector), found that US and UK businesses can save almost $19bn (£11.7bn) as a result of deploying 10,000 telepresence units by 2020.

By cancelling the need for long- and short-haul executive flights between offices, the same study suggested that teleconferencing technology and other virtual tools could reduce global annual greenhouse gas emissions by 15% by the year 2020.

But that is just the start. The next generation of video telepresence systems aims to fit even more seamlessly into our lives — by adding realistic 3D capabilities.

The technology, known as holographic telepresence, is more Star Trek than staff meeting. Instead of a flat screen, a three-dimensional moving image of a user is reproduced at each meeting location.
Currently the effect is not a true hologram. The technology company Musion, based in the UK, adapts an illusion commonly used in theatres and theme parks known as the Pepper's ghost effect. An HD projector illuminates a thin, effectively invisible, sheet-like “foil” from a 45-degree angle, creating a 3D image almost indistinguishable from an actual person. The Musion TelePresence system can now transmit full-sized people and objects in real-time “without any significant delay in communication”, the company says.

The system achieved a Guinness World Record in 2012 by helping Indian politician Narendra Modi deliver a 55-minute campaign speech to audiences in 53 different locations simultaneously. And in the entertainment world, Musion was one of three companies credited for digitally resurrecting rapper Tupac Shakur onstage at the 2012 Coachella festival.

But true holograms might not be far away. Leia Display System is currently working on an alternative technology. The Polish company has built a holographic room, measuring 3m (10ft) by 2.5m (8ft), which uses laser projectors to beam 3D images onto a thin cloud of water vapour — providing not only a giant 3D multi-touch screen, but also the ability to walk through the images and see them from any point of view.

Holographic telepresence like this has obvious potential beyond from the business world. Healthcare is already being revolutionised by telemedicine, allowing patients to be treated remotely, whether in isolated areas or on a distant battlefield.

Hologram technology could also see advances in areas like education, enhanced movies, television programming, advertising, gaming, 3D mapping, aerospace navigation and robot control.
Still other improvements could be imminent. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US is examining how physical surfaces can be manipulated by gestures, with objects being resized, reshaped or moved remotely by people thousands of miles away. This offers the potential for virtual offices, where hundreds or even thousands of people could collaborate on a product without ever touching it.

Researchers at the University of Tokyo are also working on adding haptic feedback (vibrations, for example) to holographic projections by using ultrasound waves. A user can touch and interact with a hologram and receive tactile responses as if the holographic object were real.

In an IBM survey of 3,000 researchers, respondents named holographic video calls as one of the five technologies they expect to see in place by 2015.

There are obstacles to using these technologies, of course. Not least is the cost of holographic technology: Musion currently rents its system for around $65,000 (£40,000). Live telepresence also needs a fast, direct connection of 10-20 megabytes per second (Mbps), as the recordings are of higher quality.

“But thanks to 4G and LTE networks — and 5G coming soon — bandwidth is no longer a problem,” says Huawei Enterprise’s He Liang.

“[Telepresence] will mean that we don’t have to work in an office,” he explains. “That we don’t have to travel miles to be treated by a doctor. That we can interact with our families from a different country. It will begin to change the world we live in.”

Huawei released the industry's first panoramic telepresence system(TPS). This TPS adopts Huawei's patented co-optical center camera with panoramic gapless imaging and image stitching technologies, giving users a truly immersive experience.

Huawei's panoramic TPS provides open interfaces to interconnect with the systems of other vendors, thereby protecting the customer's investment.

Huawei's panoramic telepresence system is able to save up to 30% TCO for the customer because it requires 25% less bandwidth, 42% less energy, and 26% less physical space.

Friday, February 28, 2014

A phone that self-destructs if tampered with

NEW YORK: Boeing Co on Wednesday unveiled a smartphone that appears to come straight from a James Bond spy movie. In addition to encrypting calls, any attempt to open the casing of the Boeing Black Smartphone deletes all data and renders the device inoperable. 

The secure phone marks an extension of the communications arm of the Chicagobased aerospace and defence contractor, which is best known for jetliners and fighter planes. Such a phone might have prevented damage to Washington's diplomacy in Ukraine from a leaked telephone call. A senior US state department officer and the ambassador to Ukraine apparently used unencrypted cellphones for a call about political developments in Ukraine that became public. 

Boeing's tamper-proof phone is aimed at people working in defence and homeland security who need to keep communication and data secure, according to Boeing and filings with the US Federal Communications Commission . Hardware media encryption and configurable inhibit controls are embedded to protect the device, its data, and the transmission of information, significantly reducing the risk of mission compromise due to data loss, the company said. 

Made in the US, the phone runs on Google Inc's Android operating system. The 5.2-by-2 .7-inch (13.2-by-6 .9 cm) handset, slightly larger than an iPhone, uses dual SIM cards to enable it to access multiple cell networks instead of a single network like a normal cellphone. Due to the phone's security features, Boeing is releasing few details about the wireless network operators or manufacturer it is working with, and has not provided a price or date by which the phone might be widely available, but said it has begun offering the phone to potential customers. 

Boeing's website says the phone can be configured to connect with biometric sensors or satellites. Other attachments can extend battery life or use solar power. The phone can operate on the WCDMA, GSM and LTE frequency bands and offers Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity . The company has been developing the phone for 36 months, said Boeing spokeswoman Rebecca Yeamans. 

"We saw a need for our customers in a certain market space that Boeing could meet with its technology expertise ," she said. A sample purchase contract submitted to the FCC says the phone would be sold directly by Boeing or its agents.

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Think you should do better in life? Blame your great, great, great grandfather

LONDON: Miffed that you didn't get into Oxford University? Cross because you can't afford that three-bed in the town centre? Not got one non-executive directorship to your single-barrelled name? There is only one person to blame: your great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather. 

According to a new book, " 
The Son Also Rises", by academic Gregory Clark, our chances of getting on in life are largely down to what our family did 300 years ago. Contrary to brighter estimates, which suggest that past prosperity or poverty can be erased in three to four generations, Clark reckons it takes 10 to 15. 

So, those who feel held back by their modest beginnings shouldn't look to their parents' salary for an explanation: that accounts for a mere 10 per cent variation in a person's status, whereas our long-term lineage accounts for a variance of between 50 and 60 per cent. 

What that means, in effect, is that if your family were shopkeepers 200 years ago, the likelihood is you may be, too. 

Clark arrived at his conclusion by using surnames to track changes in familial fortune. He picked out the family names that dominated elite positions in historical records like the Doomsday Book and the Royal Society records and then tracked how long it took for those surnames to lose their wealth-predicting ability. 

Was Clark surprised at his findings, implying as they do that capitalism has not led to a rapid, persistent mobility? "Very surprised; astonished," he says. "It took us considerable time to realise that surnames were revealing a surprising persistence in social life that conventional methods fail to detect." 

Clark suggests that mobility in feudal England was not vastly different to today. Upwardly mobile artisans working in the 12th century took eight generations to be absorbed into the educated elite of the 16th century. 

Conversely, despite the introduction of inheritance tax and rapid industrialization, the 21st-century descendant of the 1 per centers of mid-Victorian England are likely to be three times as wealthy as the average man or woman on the bus. 

What is perhaps the most surprising feature of the research, though, is that the ancestral shadow appears to hang over all the countries surveyed, without exception. 

"Social mobility rates are similar across societies that vary dramatically in their institutions and income levels. Cradle-to-grave socialist Sweden and dog-eat-dog, free-to-lose America have similar rates. Communist China and capitalist Taiwan have similar rates. Homogenous Japan and the ethnically fractured US also have similar rates," he says. 

If proved correct, Clark's research would imply that attempts to invest society with even a ghost of social mobility have come to naught. As he says: "Only extreme, drastic and unacceptable state interventions have any hope of increasing social mobility." Not even the Communist Revolution in China in 1949 managed to have a lasting, pervasive effect on mobility, according to his study. 

While one might expect that the glacial pace of change comes as a result of the old boys' network, Clark contends that, actually, we inherit our "social competences". This conclusion has led some to suggest that he is a genetic determinist. In his own writing, it must be said, he points out that he is not saying that helping the disadvantaged doesn't produce "absolute, commendable benefits", merely that such action fails to boost social status. 

Still, though, it cuts both ways. As he says, the vast investments made by the super-rich in the education of their own kin eventually runs to nothing if their forefathers were not themselves wealthy. 

It seems then, that playing the lineage lottery is a lot like playing the real lottery — winners are few and far between.

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Samsung Unveils Water-resistant Galaxy S5 to launch in April '14

Samsung on Tuesday announced the Galaxy S5, its new flagship Android smartphone with an Apple iPhone 5S-like biometric sensor button. The phone is dust and water-resistant, sports a faster camera and offers fitness-related features.

The Galaxy S5, which was unveiled at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, will be available in 150 countries, including India, on April 11. However, the company did not announce the price of the new smartphone.

It sports a slightly larger 5.1-inch Super AMOLED (1080 X 1920p) display which looks similar to that of the Galaxy S4.

Powered by a 2.5GHz quad-core processor and 2GB RAM, the 
Galaxy S5 will come in 16GB and 32GB internal storage variants which will be expandable up to 64GB through microSD card.
"With the Galaxy S5, Samsung is going back to basics to focus on delivering the capabilities that matter most to our consumers," said JK Shin, president and head of IT & mobile communications division at Samsung. "Galaxy S5 represents an iconic design with essential and useful features to focus on delivering the ultimate smartphone in the market today through people inspired innovation."

While acknowledging the market murmur about lesser-than-expected sales of Galaxy S4, Shin revealed that Samsung had so far sold over 200 million Galaxy phones. Galaxy S4 was launched in the summer of 2013. It has faced tough competition from the likes of Apple iPhone 5 and 5S, LG G2, HTC One and Sony Xperia Z1.

Usually, Samsung launches flagship Galaxy phone every year after World Mobile Congress (MWC). But, this year, the company announced Galaxy S5 at the MWC because it wants to replace Galaxy S4 as soon as possible.

In Galaxy S5, Samsung has introduced several unique features aimed at fitness conscious users in a bid to steal Apple's thunder. It is widely rumoured that the iPhone maker will launch the successor of iPhone 5S with a clutch of health and fitness-related features.

"With the enhanced S Health 3.0, the Galaxy S5 offers more tools to help people stay fit and well. It provides a comprehensive personal fitness tracker to help users monitor and manage their behaviour, along with additional tools, including a pedometer, diet and exercise records, and a new, built-in heart rate monitor," said a Samsung spokesperson.

"Galaxy S5 users can further customize their experience with an enriched third party app ecosystem and the ability to pair with next-generation Gear products for real-time fitness coaching,"

Another highlight of the phone is a new iPhone-like fingerprint sensor integrated with the phone's home button. The finger scanner will offer a biometric screen-locking feature and mobile payment experience to consumers.

The Galaxy S5 sports a 16MP rear camera and a 2.1MP front-facing camera. The rear camera is capable of capturing 4K video at 30 frames per second. Samsung claimed the Galaxy S5 offers the world's fastest auto-focus speed up to 0.3 seconds.

The smartphone runs on Android 4.4.2 KitKat, the latest version of Google's mobile operating system. It is IP67 certified dust and water-resistant. The back panel of the phone sports a dimpled soft-touch cover, similar to the Nexus 7(2012) tablet.

Monday, February 24, 2014

Nokia X series of Android smartphones unveiled

Nokia has unveiled its first three Android smartphones after several turbulent years that saw the Finnish manufacturer lose its top spot in the mobile market as Google's free OS became the biggest mobile software in the world.

All three Android phones by Nokia - X, X+ and XL - run on a 'customized' version of Android operating system and will not have access to Play Store.

This means that those looking for a number of popular Android apps will still not have access to those. The company has also not innovated much by way of design for the new range and carried over the monobody design of its Lumia series in the new Android smartphones.

Nokia XL, the biggest of the three new smartphones, has a 5-inch screen, 5MP auto-focus camera with LED flash on the back, 2MP front camera and 1,500mAh battery.

On the other hand, 
Nokia X and X+ have 4-inch screens and 3MP fixed-focus cameras, said former Nokia CEO Stephen Elop while unveiling the devices.

All three devices will run on a 1GHz dual-core Snapdragon processor with just 512MB RAM, have access to 3G networks and have display resolution of 800x480p. Nokia will offer a 4GB microSD card free with X+ and XL smartphones, but not with the entry-level Nokia X.

As expected, Nokia has preloaded the X, X+ and XL smartphones with Microsoft's cloud services like SkyDrive and One Drive, instead of Google's software, which may prove a dampener for some. The company is offering 10GB of One Drive storage for free.

Some of the apps pre-installed on the devices are Here Maps, Nokia Mix Radio, Facebook, Skype, BBM etc. Users can download apps from the Nokia store, or choose to sideload apps directly from the web.

Interestingly, the home screen of Nokia's three Android smartphones is heavily influence by that of Windows Phone operating system and features Live Tiles. The company has also included FastLane multitasking solution, which it debuted with the revamped Asha series, and Glance Screen in the new smartphones.

Nokia announced that Nokia X will be available immediately in Europe for 89 euros, whereas X+ and XL will hit the stores in early Q2 2014 for 99 and 109 euros respectively. However, it added that the three models will hit markets like India, Africa, Middle East, Asia Pacific and Europe first, without indicating the price range for these markets.

Elop said that Nokia, set to be acquired by 
Microsoft soon, will encourage app ecosystem for the Nokia X platform.

WhatsApp founder apologizes for 'longest and biggest outage in years'

WhatsApp, which has more than 450 million monthly users, said it was having "server issues".
The company suffered the outage just days after it was snapped up by Facebook for $19bn (£11.4bn).
The messaging service tweeted at 8.16pm UK time on Saturday: "We hope to be back up and recovered shortly."
Users reacted angrily, saying their chat conversations were only showing a loading asterisk and the alert "Connecting..."
Taylor ITWT16 said on Twitter: "As Soon As Facebook Buys Whatsapp, Whatsapp Starts Malfunctioning."
Jazzy tweeted: "Its been like 4 hours, you would have thought they could sort whatsapp out by now."
By 10.30pm the service appeared to be working again.
The firm tweeted: "WhatsApp service has been restored. We are so sorry for the downtime."
Facebook announced last Thursday that it would pay $4bn (£2.4bn) in cash and $15bn (£9bn) in Facebook shares as part of the deal to buy the real-time messaging service.
The app's founders and employees will get $3bn (£1.8bn) of the shares as restricted stock that will vest over four years after the deal closes.
The purchase marks the largest single acquisition in Facebook's 10-year history.
WhatsApp will "continue to operate independently and retain its brand" despite the acquisition, Facebook said.
Founded by a Ukrainian immigrant who dropped out of college, Jan Koum, and a Stanford alumnus, Brian Acton, WhatsApp is a Silicon Valley startup fairytale.
The acquisition will also see Mr Koum - a former Yahoo! engineer - join Facebook's board of directors.

Facebook is known to make bold moves to thwart competitors - it famously bought Instagram for $1bn after a weekend of negotiations.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

World's largest oyster discovered

WASHIGNTON: A 14-inch long giant Pacific oyster found off the coast of Denmark has been confirmed as the world's largest by the Guinness Book of World Records. 

The giant mollusc was found in October last year and is still alive and growing, according to
Christine Ditlefsen, biologist at the Wadden Sea Centre. 

The Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) measures 35.5 cm (13.97 in) in length and 10.7 cm (4.21 in) in width, Guinness said on its website. 

Roughly the length of a size 11 shoe, this large mollusc has another five oysters attached to it. 

In total, this cluster of oysters weighs 1.62 kg, 'National Public Radio' reported. 

The oyster was found in October last year in Wadden Sea National Park, on Denmark's southwestern coast. 

Its size and shape could be said to resemble a huge plaintain. But when it was found, the Wadden staff compared the oyster to a large and sturdy shoe, the report said. 

"It is 15-20 years old, and probably one of the first Pacific Oysters (Crassostrea gigas) that came to our part of the Wadden Sea," said Ditlefsen. 

Friday, February 21, 2014

Here's Why Facebook Acquired Messaging App WhatsApp For $19 Billion

Facebook announced that it is acquiring mobile messaging app WhatsApp for $19 billion, making it Facebook's largest acquisition to date.
In a statement, WhatsApp said that it will continue to operate independently and autonomously and will stick to its policy of not taking ads.
WhatsApp is the largest and fastest-growing mobile messaging app competing for revenue in the $100 billion-plus mobile messaging market, which was once dominated by mobile carriers and their SMS text services. Here's why it was an attractive target, even considering the big price-tag:
·         WhatsApp has more than 450 million monthly active users as of today, which is approximately 37% the size of Facebook's monthly active audience. 
      WhatsApp's closest competitor, WeChat, has approximately 320 million monthly active users as of Jan. 20, who are located primarily in China. WhatsApp has a much broader user base geographically.

·         In fact, it's extremely popular virtually everywhere: As recently as April 19 2013, it ranked as the number one top-selling paid iPhone app in 54 countries, and was in the number two spot in the United States, according to AppAnnie. It has shown persistence on the leader-boards. Today, it's number one in thirteen countries.

·         It boasts huge usage numbers, meaning it could be a valuable source of data for Facebook: WhatsApp users were sending 16 billion messages and 500 million images each day in December 2013. For comparison, Facebook users were sharing approximately 350 million images each day.

·         Facebook already has a messaging app with Facebook Messenger, but WhatsApp will bring a much larger footprint to the social network. For example, WhatsApp is used by 41% of Android smartphone users globally while Messenger is used by 16%. Moreover, Android smartphone users average 195 minutes each month using WhatsApp, while Messenger users average 21 minutes. That's roughly nine times more time-spend. It's evidence that WhatsApp oft-praised clean and fast user interface is very effective in keeping users glued to the app.
The acquisition of WhatsApp will also bolster Facebook's growing portfolio of stand-alone mobile apps that focus on different activities. Instagram is for photo and video-sharing, Paper is for consuming news, and WhatsApp is for messaging.
An interesting storyline that will emerge from this acquisition is how Facebook plans to make money from WhatsApp. Currently, WhatsApp is free to use for the first year and costs $0.99 each year thereafter. WhatsApp's founders have been extremely vocal about never showing ads on the app and even published a manifesto of sorts explaining why.
As we mentioned, WhatsApp CEO and co-founder Jan Koum said in announcing the deal that WhatsApp will not change that no-ads policy, and that "nothing" will change for users. Koum will have a seat on Facebook's board of directors, so there is evidence that he will have real clout.

However, Facebook generates revenues largely through advertising, and so it wasn't a surprise when it introduced ads to Instagram shortly after that acquisition. If WhatsApp really is to rely solely on subscription revenue, there might be pressure for WhatsApp to at least share user data with its data-hungry parent social network. In any case, it will be an interesting test case to watch in the context of mobile monetization.

Another Winner in Facebook-WhatsApp deal: Your wallet

Facebook's acquisition of WhatsApp for at least $16 billion has minted dozens of new millionaires and billionaires this week, but there was another big winner in the deal: Parents and their teenage children, who have most likely saved hundreds or even thousands of dollars in texting fees thanks to the hugely popular messaging app, and will continue to do so after the deal.

Before WhatsApp -- and Line, Viber, WeChat and a few other messaging apps now being hungrily adopted by young people and adults across the globe -- the main way to send a message from one phone to another was through SMS, a technology that routed the text through the same infrastructure that mobile carriers used to handle voice calls.

To the carriers, these texts are essentially free to provide. Each text occupies a minuscule amount of bandwidth on their airwaves, and it rides across the infrastructure that they have set up to provide voice calls.

But because there is little competition in SMS -- after you sign up for a carrier, you cannot send your SMS messages through any other provider -- carriers once charged exorbitant rates for texts, minting huge profits.

In the United States, until recently, Verizon charged 20 cents a text to customers who did not sign up for a messaging plan. Those who did -- at $5-$20 a month per phone -- could bring their costs down to as low as half a cent a message, although that was only if 5,000 messages were sent a month. AT&T's rates were similar, and so were those of many carriers around the world.

These prices proved enormously lucrative for carriers. Analysts' estimates put global SMS revenue at around $100 billion a year annually -- money that was essentially all profit for carriers.

WhatsApp did not start out as a messaging app. Its earliest version, introduced in 2009, was more of a mobile status-updating app - something closer to Twitter than SMS. But as Forbes reported in a detailed profile of the company, its founders quickly noticed that people began using the app for back-and-forth communication, a way to send texts without incurring SMS fees.

Technically, this was not totally free to users, but it was very close to free. WhatsApp routes its messages over the internet, so people had to have a mobile data plan to use it. They also had to have a smartphone. (SMS could work on more basic phones.) But after that cost, each message over WhatsApp required such a tiny slice of mobile bandwidth that it was basically free. If you paid AT&T $25 for a 2-gigabytes-a-month data plan, each WhatsApp message might cost about two ten-thousandths of a cent, according to Gizmodo's math.

This means that someone who sent 5,000 messages over WhatsApp, a not unreasonable number for some overactive teenagers, would pay about a penny in data fees. If 5,000 SMS texts were sent at AT&T's nonplan rate of 20 cents a message, the sender would be out $1,000, which is 100,000 times WhatsApp's price.

But internet texting was not just cheaper, it was also better. In WhatsApp's early days, it was one of hundreds of apps trying to offer a replacement for SMS, so it was forced to create a better service to stand out. Among other features, it eschewed ads, while some competitors' apps were glutted with them, and per-message fees.

The company also focused on the service's functionality, making sure messages flew across the globe extremely quickly and efficiently, and that the app itself was well designed and easy to use.

Its founders were also determined to make the app work everywhere: They started on the iPhone, but quickly created versions for Android, BlackBerry, Symbian and Windows Phone. This gave WhatsApp a leg up over proprietary messaging systems like BlackBerry's BBM and Apple's iMessage, which worked only for messages between similar devices.

It is still unclear whether WhatsApp can make a lot of money providing very cheap texts. Today, it charges $1 for the app, and then, after one year of use, $1 per user per year. With 450 million users and growing, that could add up to a lot of money, but it is not obvious that the company is worth as much as $19 billion.


That is especially true when you consider that the service does not collect a lot of data about its users - data that the company's new owner might use for ad targeting - and that it has pledged to remain ad-free after the acquisition.

But to users, WhatsApp's fortunes are almost irrelevant now. In response to the rise of WhatsApp and other app-based messaging services, carriers have had to reduce their SMS prices. Both AT&T and Verizon now offer unlimited texting with their basic smartphone plans. Around the world, carriers' SMS revenues are now falling by tens of billions of dollars a year.

And even if 
Facebook fails to turn WhatsApp into a viable business, we are never going to return to the old pay-per-text days. Messaging is now on a one-way path toward its natural price, which is free.

There is a larger lesson in this story: When telecom companies control specific protocols on their lines -- whether it is texting, voice calls or even cable TV -- customers lose out. And as soon as our devices get access to the open internet, we have a bounty of competitive choices that reduce prices and improve service.

What happened to texts is likely to happen to voice calls, too, in a few years' time. Because of competition from FaceTime Audio, Google Hangouts, Skype and lots and lots of other internet-phone services, few of us will worry about voice minutes anymore; for some, that might even be true today.

And perhaps the SMS story will play out on TV, too. Cable is expensive and inflexible. Internet-based alternatives like Netflix and YouTube are cheap and available everywhere. In the long run, there is only one way that story ends.

Batteries that run on human movement

MELBOURNE: Scientists are developing gen-next batteries that capture the energy of our everyday movements, such as walking, to convert it into electricity to power cellphones and other devices. 

Researchers have for many years attempted to harvest energy from our everyday movements to allow us to trickle charge electronic devices while we are walking without the need for expensive and cumbersome gadgets such as
solar panels or hand-cranked chargers. 

Lightweight devices are limited in the voltage that they can produce from our low-frequency movements to a few millivolts. 

Now, Jiayang Song and Kean Aw of The 
University of Auckland, New Zealand, have built an energy harvester that consists of a snake-shapes strip of silicone, polydimethylsiloxane, this acts as a flexible cantilever that bends back and forth with body movements. 

The cantilever is attached to a conducting metal coil with a strong neodymium, NdFeB, magnet inside, all enclosed in a polymer casing. When a conductor moves through a magnetic field a current is induced in the conductor. 

This has been the basis of electrical generation in power stations, dynamos and other such systems since the discovery of the effect in the nineteenth century. 

Using a powerful magnet and a conducting coil with lots of turns means a higher voltage can be produced. 

In order to extract the electricity generated, there is a need to include special circuitry that takes only the positive voltage and passes it along to a rechargeable battery. 

The development of kinetic chargers has been stymied by current diode technology that requires a voltage of around 200 millivolts to drive a current. 

Song and Aw have now side-stepped this obstacle by using a tiny electrical transformer and a capacitor, which acts like a microelectronic battery. 

Their charger weighing just a few grammes oscillates, wiggling the coil back and forth through the neodymium magnetic field and produces 40 millivolts. 

The transformer captures this voltage and stores up the charge in the capacitor in fractions of a second. Once the capacitor is full it discharges sending a positive pulse to the rechargeable battery, thus acting as its own rectifier. 

The team concedes that this is just the first step towards a viable trickle charger that could be used to keep medical devices, monitors and sensors trickle charged while a person goes about their normal lives without the need for access to a power supply. 

The study was published in the International Journal Biomechatronics and Biomedical Robotics.

Google wanted to buy WhatsApp for even more than $19 billion

Internet search titan Google reportedly went all out to thwart Facebook's acquisition of mobile messaging app WhatsApp. According to a report by TheInformation, Google CEO Larry Page went to meet WhatsApp chief Jan Koum last week in a desperate bid to prevent the deal from materializing.

The report cites three sources claiming that Page reached out to Koum upon hearing of Zuckerberg's offer of giving him a seat on the board of directors of 
Facebook as part of the acquisition deal. One of the sources says that Page told Koum, "Stay independent as you've always planned. You're a big threat to Facebook. And joining Facebook would have a major impact on how things play out for years to come."

It goes on to say that Google was ready to outbid Facebook's $19 billion offer, but Koum reportedly felt that Facebook would give it more independence and the two share the view of bringing people closer.

One of the sources says that Google itself was not too happy about paying such a huge sum for the messaging app but was willing nevertheless in order to keep
it out of Facebook's hands.

This is not the first time Google has approached WhatsApp. Before WhatsApp agreed for Facebook's $19 billion deal, speculation was rife that Google also tried its luck at acquiring the popular messaging service.

A report by Fortune cites two separate sources to claim that Google offered to purchase WhatsApp for $10 billion, though it's unclear exactly when the search giant attempted to arrange a deal. The report stated that the bid came without a promise of a Google board seat, unlike Facebook's agreement.

Another report by The Information cites three unnamed sources as saying that Google was even willing to top Facebook's $19 billion offer. Google CEO Larry Page also assured WhatsApp co-founder Jan Koum that Google will allow the messaging startup to operate independently and compete with Facebook. However, WhatsApp founders rebuffed the offer as they reportedly felt the company was able to identify more with Facebook's philosophy.

It also mentions that Google had made an offer to WhatsApp wherein it would get the right to be notified in case WhatsApp entered acquisition talks, in exchange for a sum amounting to millions of dollars. WhatsApp did not accept the offer made a few months ago.

Following the deal with Facebook, Koum would take a place at Facebook's board and has assured that "nothing" would change for users immediately as Facebook plans to run WhatsApp independently, much like Instagram.

Facebook-Whatsapp Deal: Little Known Facts

In a landmark deal, Facebook is buying most popular mobile-messaging platform WhatsApp. The WhatsApp deal is worth more than what Facebook raised in its own IPO in 2012.
Here are some little-known facts about one of the largest tech acquisitions.

Facebook's largest acquisition ever

WhatsApp is Facebook's largest-ever acquisition. The social networking giant will pay $4 billion in cash and $12 billion worth of shares for WhatsApp. But the ultimate cost of the deal is $19 billion, with WhatsApp employees and founders receiving an additional $3 billion in restricted stock units of Facebook.

The acquisition dwarfs the $1 billion that Facebook paid for photo-sharing service Instagram. Several analysts had termed Instagram acquisition expensive. But now, Facebook is paying $42 per user with the deal. 

Deal bigger than any Microsoft, Google, Apple deal ever

The WhatsApp acquisition is one of the IT industry's biggest deals. It is larger than any that Google, Microsoft or Apple have ever done. Google's biggest deal was its $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, while Microsoft's biggest acquisition deal was of Skype at $8.5 billion. Apple, on the other hand, has never cut a deal above $1 billion

Informal talks went for over two years

Surprisingly, informal discussions between the two companies had been going for two years. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg first reached out to WhatsApp co-founder Jan Koum in 2012. The two reportedly met at a coffee shop in California. However, the deal started shaping up earlier this month when Koum went to Zuckerberg’s house in Palo Alto for dinner.

According to reports, this is when the conversation about a possible deal became serious. Zuckerberg is said to have proposed that the two companies join together and Koum join Facebook's board.

Biggest-ever internet deal

According to Bloomberg data, the WhatsApp acquisition is one of the biggest internet deals since Time Warner's $124 billion merger with AOL in 2001.

Also, as per Dow Jones VentureSource, the deal is the largest acquisition ever of a venture capital-backed startup.

Google’s unusual offer to WhatsApp

Google’s unusual offer to WhatsApp Google’s unusual offer to WhatsApp

WhatsApp also reportedly received an unusual offer from Google that it is said to have turned down. Google reportedly offered to pay WhatsApp in exchange for the right to be notified if the messaging app ever entered into acquisition talks with another company. 

A report in Fortune claims that Google even offered to outrightly purchase WhatsApp for $10 billion. The offer is said to be sans the promise of a seat on Google's board for Koum, unlike the Facebook agreement.